Follow Leafschatter on Twitter

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Rating the Phil Kessel Trade One Year Later

Phil Kessel - Bargain at $5.4 mil Cap Salary
Let me start by saying the Phil Kessel trade between Toronto Maple Leafs and Boston Bruins to be a great deal for Toronto.  I have always held this belief from the day the trade was announced.  I do acknowledge a high price was paid with two first round and one second round draft picks.  But, it was worth it.

Like others, I assessed the trade by evaluating the two types assets involved in the trade: (1) Players; and (2) Draft Picks.  Lately, I have gained an appreciation for an additional asset involved in the trade but rarely mentioned.

At the start, I came to my conclusion with two premises.  First, Phil Kessel is a potential to be a 50-goal scorer.  Second, it is hard to get 50-goal scorers.

When Boston drafted Tyler Seguin with the first of two first round draft picsk from Toronto, I concluded comparing Phil Kessel to Tyler Seguin is not the best way to evaluate the trade.  The trade's success for Toronto depends on Brian Burke's ability to do another transaction similar to this one.  He must keep his salary cap clean, have draft picks available, and hope another team has problems resigning its elite player.

Phil Kessel is a Potential 50 Goal Scorer.  This, I believed from the very day he was traded to Toronto.  He was drafted fifth overall in the 2006 Entry draft and scored 36 goals at the age of 21.  Typically, goal scorers have their best years between the ages of 24 and 26.  You can expect a 50 goal scorer to have his first 50-goal season before the age of 27.  You have to look back 15 years to find  an NHL player who became a 50 goal scorers at a later age.

Too illustrate the significance of his 36 goals at age 21, I have created table, shown below, listing all the 50-goal scorers since the lockout season with their goals scored at age 21 with some exceptions.  Ilya Kovalchuk's goals are from age 20 because he was 21 during the lockout season and Steven Stamkos' goals are from age 19 because he just turned 20.

Goals at Age 21 - Phil Kessel and Post Lockout 50-Goal Scorers
Player
Goals
At 21
DraftedDraft YearCap Salary
2009/2010
Comments
Steven Stamkos
51*
1st
2008
$3.72 mil
Goals at age 19
Alex Ovechkin
46
1st
2004
$9.53 mil
52 Goals at age 20
Ilya Kovalchuk
41*
1st
2001
$6.38 mil
Goals at age 20
Dany Heatley
41
2nd
2000
$7.50 mil
50 Goals at age 25
Phil Kessel
36
5th
2006
$5.40 mil
 Now age 23
Sydney Crosby
33
1st
2005
$8.70 mil
50 Goals at age 22
Jaromir Jagr
32
5th
1990
$7.00 mil
Now in KHL age 39 
Jarome Iginla
28
11th
1995
$7.00 mil
52 Goals at age 24  
Vincent Lecavalier
20
1st
1998
$7.72 mil
52 Goals at age 26 
Jonathon Cheechoo
21*
29th
1998
$3.00 mil
In AHL at age 21

As the table shows, at age 21, he compares very well to the 50 goal scorers.  A few weeks ago, Toronto Maple Leafs coach Ron Wilson did predict Phil Kessel will score over 40 goals this season at age 23.  We have many real reasons to believe Phil Kessel will prove Wilson correct.  This includes his fast start of five goals in his first five games played.

A player is on the verge of becoming a 50 scoring when he scores 40 goals before the age of 24.  Below is a table slotting Phil Kessel with the other potential 50 goal scorers.

Goals at Age 21 - Potential 50-Goal Scorers 
Player
Goals
At 21
DraftedDraft YearCap Salary
2009/2010
Age at Start
of 2010-2011
Evgeni Malkin
47
2nd
2004
$8.70 mil
24
Phil Kessel
36
5th
2006
$5.40 mil
23
Rick Nash
31
1st
2002
$7.80 mil
26
Eric Staal
30
2nd
2003
$8.25 mil
25
Thomas Vanek
25
5th
2003
$7.14 mil
26


50 Goal Scorers are Hard to Get.  You typically acquire them with a first round draft pick.  You have just over a 70% chance with the first overall pick.  Anything less and your odds dropp drastically.  In fact, without a top five pick, getting a 50-goal scorer from the draft is virtually hopeless.

Last season, only three players (Alex Ovechkin, Steven Stamkos, and Sydney Crosby) scored 50 goals.  Two of them did it for the first time!  Since the lockout, only nine players have been 50-goals scorers.  Three of them (Dany Heatley, Ilya Kovalchuk, and Jarome Iginla) were traded before the age of 27.  Most notably, two of them (Dany Heatley and Ilya Kovalchuk) were traded from Atlanta Thrashers.

In short, if you want a 50-goal scorer, you should hope your team or Atlanta Thrashers have one of the top two picks in the Entry Draft.

To reiterate the point, only one NHL franchise has drafted more than three 50-goal scorers in its franchise history.  Pittsburgh Penguins has drafted seven 50-goal scorers with their first round draft picks.  The next best is three 50-goal scorers by Boston Bruins, Washington Capitals, Winnipeg Jets, and Minnesota North Stars/Dallas Stars.  Interestingly, Montreal Canadiens only drafted two 50-goal scorers with its first round draft picks in spite of being notorious for acquiring first round draft picks from poor performing teams.  Edmonton Oilers never drafted a 50-goal scorer with its first round draft picks.

First round draft picks are money in the bank only when you finish dead last.  As shown in the first table, most 50 goal scorers are drafted first overall.  It is almost impossible to draft a 50 goal scorer without selecting the first forward in the entry draft.  A franchise cannot plan on having these coveted draft picks without being god awful and risk going defunct or trading most of its self-respect. 

Phil Kessel's Contract is the Hidden Asset in the Trade.  Phil Kessel was immediately signed to a $5.4 million cap salary five-year contract when traded to Toronto.  It is a bargain when you compare it to the 50 goal scorers and potential 50 goal scorers.  This type of players usually costs at least $7 mil in cap salary.

Steven Stamkos is the only player with a lower cap salary.  He is on an entry level contract which has a cap salary limit and expires at the end of this season.  Expect him to get at least $7 mil on his next contract.  Perhaps more than Ovechkin's $9.53 if other teams pursue this RFA.  He may even receive a max cap offer of $11.88 mil.  Max cap is the maximum amount a player can be paid which is 20% of a team's salary cap $59.4 mil.

Phil Kessel's $5.4 mil cap salary is a significant reason why Toronto currently has $4.7 mil cap space and will be well positioned to pursue elite RFAs (Restricted Free Agents) at the end of this season.  Steven Stamkos, Shea Weber, Jeff Carter, Zach Parise, and Brent Seabrook are some of the elite RFA who do not have their contracts extended.

As said at the start, the full success of this trade depends on doing another deal like it.  Adding another elite player to play with Phil Kessel will make Toronto Maple Leafs a force to contend with for many years.  Brian Burke has prepared Toronto to follow through with this pursuit by having the cap space and draft picks in place for off-season.  All without trading an ounce of self-respect.

Ecklund, Spectorshockey, and mynhltraderumors will have a field day with RFA rumours. Toronto's Cap Nation will follow them with great interest.  This is much better than joining Tank Nation to cheer your team to last place.





Follow @Leafschatter 

4 comments:

  1. At the time, the deal was great. Of course hindsight will judge the move based on how Seguin develops but you definitely got a more known commodity with Kessel (even if you knew you'd be drafting second overall).

    The one big downside to the move as I see it is the absence of Entry-Level deals. Burke has done well to sign college free agents but those guys end up with bonus-heavy deals that aren't quite as cap-friendly as drafted players.

    I'm looking forward to seeing what happens with the cap space that Finger freed up. I'm not usually one to play the rumour mill but if you hear Brad Richards' name enough times...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Curt, I think people, including Leafs fans will drool over Tyler Seguin. Joe Haggerty has been tweeting (@HackswithHaggs) great reports on his play.

    Comments from you and Bill Watters on amateur free agents got me thinking and I already made notes for a blog post on the subject.

    Bottom line is cap management is critical to sustained success and you make excellent points on how it can be attained.

    That being said...Brad Richards...Brad Richards...guest what is in my next blog post.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The trade at the time was good for both teams and isn't a Raycroft for Rask redux by any means. Trading picks is always a risk. Seguin looks to be a stud and the other X factor is where next years #1 pick will be. If paired with a true #1 center, Kessel should be a consistent 40+ goal scorer. Both teams fans should be happy.

    Kessel is certainly more 1 dimensional than the other players listed that are making those 7mil+ contracts (with the exception of Vanek and I'd argue that was a bad deal). I wouldn't so much say that Kessel is a great deal, but that he is being paid properly.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you for the comments Ethan. I am 50/50 on whether Kessel is a 40 or 50 goal scorer. I lean to the 50-goal scorer but see a "strong" argument can be made to see him as 40-goal scorer. Once a person believes he is a 40-goal scorer, everything else in your assessment of him falls into place.

    I don't believe next year's number one pick will be high. However, I felt the same about this year's pick. So, I am better off waiting, like you, until the end of the season.

    Peter Chiarelli's cap management style is one aspect I did not cover but appears to be significant in this trade and Joe Thornton's trade. Given the interest shown in this piece by Boston Bruins fans, I plan to do a follow-up piece on how Chiarelli used this trade to manage his cap and gain cap room.

    Both Boston and New Jersey are at the cap ceiling. New Jersey's situation looks like a mess. Where as Boston's situation appears to be on the other end of the spectrum where they are pushing the cap envelope with everyhting under control.

    Trading Joe Thornton and Phil Kessel ensured Boston does not have a New Jersey situation on its hands. This definitely deserves to be reviewed.

    ReplyDelete