Follow Leafschatter on Twitter

Showing posts with label brian burke. Show all posts
Showing posts with label brian burke. Show all posts

Monday, February 21, 2011

Brian Burke's Next Trade - Part 5 - Looking for a "Tank" Trader

Colorado Avalanche will want to Trade
with Toronto if They Intend to Tank
We have seen a flurry of trade activity from Brian Burke in the past two weeks.  He "Time Machine" traded Tomas Kaberle and Francois Beauchemin; cashed out (salvage trade) on Kris Versteeg; and "Making Room for Prospects" traded Mikhail Stefanovich.

As a result, Brian Burke acquired two 2011 1st round draft picks, Joe Colborne (age 20 - drafted 16th 2008), Jake Gardiner (age 20 - drafted 17th in 2008), Joffrey Lupul (age 27 - drafted 7th 2002), and Fabian Brunnstrom (age 25).  Other than Brunnstrom, everything acquired can be used as assets for "Catching the Big Fish" trades.

As discussed in "Brian Burke's Next Trade - Part 3 - Catching the Big Fish", most of the "Big Fish" trades are done in the off-season.  Teams usually try to salvage bad situations with top players by trading them during the summer.  This rarely gets done at trade deadline.  In fact, Brian Burke indicated he expects his next big trade to most likely occur in the summer.

Brian Burke probably has completed all of his trades to cup contenders.  He does have his eye on Brayden Schenn, Los Angeles Kings top prospect.  However, it is most unlikely a deal gets done.  Los Angeles is a borderline playoff team.  They will only consider such a trade if they were in the middle of the playoff pack.  Furthermore, they "Tank Traded" Mike Cammellari in order to finish low in 2009 and draft Brayden Schenn.  Los Angeles trading Brayden Schenn will be like Brian Burke trading Phil Kessel.  It will only happen if the return is to big to turn down.

There might be one type of "Big Fish" trade available to Burke at trade deadline.  It can be with a team wanting to "Tank Trade".  By "Tank Trade", we refer to a team trading their best player who is at the height of their career with the primary purpose of finishing as low as possible to get the top draft pick.  In addition, the "Big Fish" player typically is the highest salaried player on the team.

Past examples are:
  1. St. Louis trading Chris Pronger which resulted in having the 1st overall pick in 2006.  The Blues drafted Erik Johnson.
  2. Boston trading Joe Thornton which resulted in having the 5th overall pick in 2006.  The Bruins drafted Phil Kessel
  3. Tampa Bay trading Brad Richards which resulted in having the 1st overall pick in 2008.  The Lightning drafted Steven Stamkos.
  4. Los Angeles trading Mike Cammellari wich resulted in having the 5th overall pick in 2009.  The Kings drafted Brayden Schenn.
What the "Tank Traders" got in return paled in comparison to the "Big Fish" they gave up.  It was strictly about shedding salary and getting the next top prospect.

In the next week, Brian Burke will be on the lookout for "Tank Traders".  Who may they be?  A close look at the bottom of the league standings quickly identifies the possible candidates.

NHL Standings after 20th Feb 2011
RankTeamGPWLTPtsLast 10
24
Florida
58
25
26
7
57
3 - 5 -2
25
Colorado
59
25
27
7
57
0 - 9 - 1
26
Toronto
59
25
27
7
57
6 - 2 - 2
27
New Jersey
59
25
30
4
54
9 - 0 - 1
28
Islanders
59
22
30
7
51
7 - 3 - 0
29
Ottawa
59
19
31
9
47
2 - 6 - 2
30
Edmonton
59
19
32
8
46
4 - 6 - 0

You can rule out New Jersey and New York Islanders.  New Jersey has just committed to Ilya Kovalchuk in the past year.  Where as the Islanders have completed their "Tank Trades" when they traded Dwayne Roloson and James Wisniewski.

Ottawa and Edmonton are weak candidates given they are already at the bottom and don't have budget issues.  They seem to be more interested in getting maximum value for their players such as Jason Spezza. If Burke inquires about their tanking intentions, he will probably target Jason Spezza (age 27 - $8 mil salary this season), Dustin Penner (age 28 - $4.25 mil salary this season), and Ryan Whitney (age 27 - $5 mil salary next season).

The true "Tank Trade" candidates are Florida Panthers and Colorado Avalanche.  They are borderline lottery pick teams and dropping fast. In addition, if they intend to tank, it is in their interest to help Toronto.

I expect Brian Burke to target Colorado out of the two teams.  He will want Paul Stastny (age 25 - $6.6 mil salary for the next three seasons). Colorado already knows the value of tanking.  In 2008-09, Colorado finished 1-7-3 in their last 11 games when Paul Statsny was out with an injury.  This resulted in Colorado picking 3rd overall.  Their selection was Matt Duchene.

After drafting Matt Duchene, Colorado has acquired other young high ceiling prospects: Peter Mueller (age 22, drafted 8th in 2006) and Erik Johnson (age 22, drafted 1st in 2006).  They also have a conditional 2011 1st from St. Louis.  Colorado has actively acquired high ceiling prospects within the age of 22 years old.

Colorado may not want to do a true "Tank Trade".  Brian Burke might have to offer some 1st round draft picks to entice them into a "Tank Trade".  Never the less, do not be surprised when hearing rumours about Toronto Maple Leafs being interested in Colorado Avalanche's Paul Statsny.

You might also be interested in:
  1. Brian Burke's Next Trade - Part 1
  2. Brian Burke's Next Trade - Part 2 - Making Room for Prospects
  3. Brian Burke's Next Trade - Part 3 - Catching the Big Fish
  4. Brian Burke's Next Trade - Part 4 - Tomas Kaberle and the "Time Machine" Trade





Follow @Leafschatter 

Monday, February 14, 2011

Brian Burke's Next Trade - Part 4 - Tomas Kaberle and the "Time Machine" Trade

"Time Machine" Trades
Usually Involve Budget Teams
"Tomas Kaberle and the 'Time Machine' Trade" is part of a series of "Brian Burke's Next Trade" posts:
  1. Brian Burke's Next Trade - Part 1
  2. Brian Burke's Next Trade - Part 2 - Making Room for Prospects
  3. Brian Burke's Next Trade - Part 3 - Catching the Big Fish
In essence, a "Time Machine" trade is where you trade a player in his declining playing years (when he is past 30 years old) for a player who will be part of your team's core in the immediate near future.  Presently, Tomas Kaberle is 32 years old.

Brian Burke has been trying for the past two years to pull off a "Time Machine" trade involving Tomas Kaberle.  He thought he had one with Boston Bruins before the 2009-10 season.  However, there was a significant misunderstanding.  Brian Burke thought Boston agreed to send Phil Kessel and its 2009 1st round draft pick for Tomas Kaberle.  Peter Chiarelli, Boston's Manager, thought he traded Phil Kessel for Tomas Kaberle and Toronto's 2009 1st round draft pick.

There was a reported trade with Philadelphia vetoed by Tomas Kaberle prior to Brian Burke arriving to Toronto.  It was alleged Cliff Fletcher, Toronto's Manager at the time, reached agreement with Philadelphia agreed to send 29 year-old Tomas Kaberle for 22 year-old Jeff Carter and Philadephia's  2008 1st round pick.  Tomas Kaberle has a conditional NTC (No Trade Clause) in his contract where it goes dormant during the summer when Toronto fails to make the playoffs.

Why has it been so difficult to trade Tomas Kaberle?  What can you expect in return for him?  What strategy should Brian Burke use to trade him?

History is always a good starting point to find possible answers to these questions.  Below is a list of all "Time Machine" trades since the lockout involving players older than 30 who have been All-Stars (representing their team at the NHL All-Star game) and Olympic Team players.  The ages of the players involved in the trade are in brackets.  Players who were 1st round drafts picks have their draft position listed after their age.  Highlighted in yellow are "Time Machine" trades that appear to be successful in yielding younger players.  Past Hart Trophy winners are in bold letters.


"Time Machine" Trades Since the Lockout
DatePlayers Traded ToPlayers Acquired By
15-Nov-05
CBJ
Sergei Fedorov (35)
5th 2006 (Maxime Frechette)
ANA
Francois Beauchemin (25)
Tyler Wright (32) 12th
30-Jan-06
CAR
Doug Weight (35)
Erkki Rajamaki (26)
STL
1st 2006 (upgrade trade)
              (Patrik Bergland)
Mike Zigomannis (24)
Jesse Boulerice (27)
Magnus Kahnberg (25)
16-Dec-06
PHA
Alexei Zhitnik (33)
NYI
Freddie Meyer (26)
3rd 2007 (Mark Katic)
14-Feb-07
ATL
Alexei Zhitnik (33)
PHA
Braydon Coburn (21) 8th
15-Feb-07
NAS
Peter Forsberg (33) 5th
PHA
Scottie Upshall (23) 6th
Ryan Parent (19) 18th
1st 2007 (traded for players)
              (Scott Hartnell)
              (Kimmo Timanen)
3rd 2007 (traded)
27-Feb-07
SJ
Bill Guerin (36)
STL
Ville Nieminen (29)
1st 2007 (David Perron)
27-Feb-07
NYI
Ryan Smyth (30) 6th
EDM
Robert Nilsson (21) 15th
Ryan O'Marra (19) 15th
1st 2007 (Alex Plante)
22-Jun-07
FLA
Tomas Vokoun (31)
NAS
1st 2008 (upgrade trade)
              (Colin Wilson)
2nd 2007 (Nick Spaling)
2nd 2008 (traded)
14-Dec-07
ANA
Doug Weight (37)
Michal Birner (21)
7th 2007 (Paul Karpowich)
STL
Andy McDonald (30)
26-Feb-08
COL
Adam Foote (36)
CBJ
1st 2008 (traded for players)
              (RJ Umberger)
4th 2008 (David Savard)
29-Jun-08
Edm
Lubomir Visnovsky (32)
LA
Jarret Stoll (26)
Matt Greene (25)
26-Jun-09
PHA
Chris Pronger (34) 2nd
Ryan Dingle (25)
ANA
Joffrey Lupul (26) 7th
Luca Sbisa (20) 19th
1st 2009 (traded for picks)
              (Kyle Palmieri)
              (Matt Clark)
1st 2010 (Emerson Etem)
3-Jul-09
LA
Ryan Smyth (33) 6th
COL
Kyle Quincey (24)
Tom Preissing (30)
5th 2010 (Luke Walker)
3-Mar-10
ANA
Lubomir Visnovsky (33)
EDM
Ryan Whitney (26) 5th
6th 2010 (Brandon Davidson)
19-Jun-10
NJ
Jason Arnott (35) 7th
NAS
2nd 2011
Matt Halischuk (22)
6-Jan-11
DAL Jamie Langenbrunner (35)
NJ
3rd 2011 (conditonal 2nd)

When reviewing these trades you will notice a few things:
  1. Budget teams typically acquire "Time Machine" trade players.
  2. "Time Machine" trades are usually done as the trade deadline approaches.
  3. Philadelphia Flyers have history of doing "Time Machine" trades.
  4. Except for the Flyers trade, returns in "Time Machine" trades have been weak in past three seasons.
  5. Boston Bruins do not participate in "Time Machine" trades.
It makes sense for budget teams to seek out "Time Machine" trades when making a cup run.  This is there only chance to acquire these types of players.  Their budgets simply don't have room to have these large salaries for a complete season.  As a result, they are not in the market to sign them as free agents.

Here are the ramifications on Burke's quest to "Time Machine" trade Tomas Kaberle:
  1. Market probably reduced to just Philadelphia because of Kaberle's NTC (No Trade Clause).  Doubtful Kaberle waives it for a budget team.
  2. Philadelphia only has $5.064 mil room in next year's cap to extend Kaberle.  Getting a contract extension as part of the trade is the rumoured requirement for Kaberle to waive his NTC.
"Time Machine" trading Tomas Kaberle may just be a forlorn hope.  This is unfortunate since Burke has targeted James Van Riemsdyk on Philadelphia.  However, Burke does have some factors working in his favour:
  1. Philadelphia needs to improve its power play.  It is currently ranked 17th in the NHL and below the league average.
  2. Moving Van Riemsdyk creates cap room for Philadelphia to extend Kaberle.
  3. Paul Holmgren, Philadelphia's Manager, values Kaberle.  Remember his willingness to trade Jeff Carter for Kaberle.
  4. Brian Burke can make the deal bigger by adding Kris Versteeg.  However, it requires Toronto taking back Brayden Colburn or Matt Carle so Flyers comply with next year's cap when extending Kaberle.  
  5. Toronto can take any unwanted cap salary from Philadelphia so Flyers can do additional trades.  For example, Holmgren may want to shed Nikolai Zherdev from their roster.  Shedding the cap salary and opening a third spot on their 50 Active Player roster.
James Van Riemsdyk and Matt Carle or Brayden Colburn for Tomas Kaberle (with contract extension) and Kris Versteeg might be too costly for Philadelphia.  Ultimately, it will come down to Paul Holmgren having to choose between "wanting to win the trade" versus "wanting to win the cup".  It will be interesting to watch.

Post Script 14-Feb-2011

Kris Versteeg was traded to Philadelphia Flyers for a 1st and 3rd round pick within two hours of posting this blog entry.  This trade makes it almost impossible to move Tomas Kaberle to Philadelphia since they are capped out.  Brian Burke and Peter Chiarelli are now forced to deal with each other again!  Fans from both teams must be holding their breadth.

Post Script 18-Feb-2011

Another observation worth noting is the importance of receiving 1st round draft picks when making "Time Machine" trades.  You see them in many "Time Machine" trades.  These draft picks are usually later traded for a top prospect or a higher draft pick.  In essence, when acquiring a 1st round draft pick, the Manager acquires an asset that holds its value over time and can be moved to any team regardless of its cap and budget restrictions.  Furthermore, 1st round draft picks do not have NTC or NMC (No Movement Clause).

Post Script Part II 18-Feb-2011

Tomas Kaberle has been traded for Joe Colborne (drafted 16th overall in 2008 Entry Draft) and Boston's 2011 1st pick and a conditional 2nd pick from 2011.  Boston's 2nd pick depends on Kaberle either resigning with Boston or Boston advancing to the Stanley Cup finals.

Only Chris Pronger and Peter Forsberg have garnered a larger return in a "Time Machine" trade.  Both of them happen to be former Hart Trophy winners and Top 5 draft picks.

However, if the initial strategy was to package Kris Versteeg to magnify Kaberle's value, Burke can claim success with Colborne, two 1st round picks, and a conditional 2nd round pick.  In fact, splitting up Versteeg to get a 1st when the strategy wasn't working increased the return and applied pressure on Boston to make a move.

As a result, the combined returns for Kaberle and Versteeg compare nicely to Forsberg and Pronger.

Traditionally, Boston has never acquired a "Time Machine" player.  They usually acquire their players such as Marc Savard, Zdano Chara, Tim Thomas, and Mark Ryder through free agency.

Traditionally, Brian Burke does not acquire prospects and 1st round picks when doing a "Time Machine" trade.  In the past, he has acquired Francois Beauchemin and Andy McDonald in these trades.  He even stated his current objective is to get players.

Brian Burke has shown tremendous flexibility.  In doing so, he has pulled a rabbit out of the hat by getting "Hart Trophy winner" like returns for Kaberle and Versteeg.





Follow @Leafschatter 

Sunday, January 30, 2011

Brian Burke's Next Trade - Part 3 - Catching The Big Fish

Brian Burke has done 3 of the last 18
"Big Fish" Trades in the NHL
Many of you are anxious to learn what Brian Burke will do for his next trade.  Three weeks age, we covered the various types of trades Brian Burke does in Brian Burke's Next Trade - Part 1.  Two weeks ago, we listed the various players on the 50 Active Player roster who might go in Brian Burke's Next Trade - Part 2 - Making Room for Prospects.

Today, we cover "Catching the Big Fish".  It should give you interesting insight into what might happen and why.  We do this by reviewing all of the "Big Fish" trades since 2005 when the current CBA came into effect.

By "Big Fish", we are talking about top players in their prime and top prospects who have yet to enter their prime.  Ages 24 to 26 are prime years for forwards and 26 to 30 for defencemen and goaltenders.  Top prospects are players who were top five selections in their draft year.  We have taken liberties to include some trades that just miss on the criteria but we still consider to be "Big Fish" trades such as Chris Pronger (at age 31), Brad Richards (at age 27), Mike Ribeiro (2nd liner in Montreal), and two prospects selected 6th overall in their draft year.

You can see the trades listed in the table below.  Along with the date of the trade, we characterize what motivated the team to give up the "Big Fish".  We also include each players age in brackets.  Following the age, is the draft position for any player originally drafted in the first round of their Entry Draft.

Big Fish Trades Since 2005
DateToBig FishFromPrice Paid
3-Aug-05
Tank
1st 2006
Erik Johnson
EDM
Chris Pronger (30) 2nd
STL
Eric Brewer (26) 5th
Jeff Woywitka (22) 27th
Doug Lynch
23-Aug-05
Salvage
Depth
I. Kovalchuk
OTT
Dany Heatley (24) 2nd
ATL
Marian Hossa (27) 12th
Greg De Vries (33)
30-Nov-05
Tank
5th 2006
Phil Kessel
SJ
Joe Thornton (26) 1st
BOS
Marco Sturm (27) 21st
Brad Stuart (26) 3rd
Wayne Primeau (29) 17th
23-Jun-06
VAN
Roberto Luongo (27) 4th
Lukas Krajicek (23) 24th
6th 2006 (Sergei Shirikov)
FLA
Todd Bertuzzi (31) 23rd
Bryan Allen (26) 4th
Alex Auld (26)
3-Jul-06
Salvage
ANA
Chris Pronger (31) 2nd
EDM
Joffrey Lupul (23) 7th
Ladislav Smid (20) 9th
1st 2007 (traded)
1st 2008 (Jordan Eberle)
2nd 2008 (traded)
29-Sep-06
Salvage
Playoff Run
LA Jack Johnson (20) 3rd
Oleg Teverdosky (29) 2nd
CAR
Tim Gleason (24) 23rd
Eric Belanger (29)
30-Sep-06
Depth
T. Plekanec
DAL Mike Ribeiro (26) MTL Janne Niinamaa (31)
15-Feb-07
Playoff Run
PHA Scottie Upshall (23) 6th
Ryan Parent (19) 18th
1st 2007 (traded)
3rd 2007 (traded)
NSH Peter Forsberg (33) 6th
18-Jun-07
Budget
PHA Scottie Hartnell (25) 6th
Kimmo Timmanen (32)
NSH 1st 2007 (Jonathon Blum)
26-Feb-08
Tank
1st 2008
S. Stamkos
DAL Brad Richards (27)
Johan Holmqvist (29)
TB Jussi Jokinen (24)
Jeff Halpern (31)
Mike Smith (25)
4th 2009 (traded)
26-Feb-08
Playoff Run
CHI Andrew Ladd (22) 4th CAR Tuomo Ruuto (24) 9th
26-Feb-08
Time Machine
SJ Brian Campbell (28)
7th 2008 (Drew Daniels)
BUF Steve Bernier (22) 16th
1st 2008 (Tyler Ennis)
20-Jun-08
Tank
5th 2009
B. Schenn
CGY Mike Cammalleri (25)
2nd 2008 (Mitch Wahl)
LA 1st 2008 (traded)
2nd 2009 (traded)
27-Jun-09
Salvage
CGY Jay Bouwmeester (26) 3rd FLA Jordan Leopald (29)
3rd 2009 (Josh Birkholz)
18-Sep-09
Cap
TOR Phil Kessel (22) 5th BOS 1st 2010 (Tyler Seguin)
2nd 2010 (Jared Knight)
1st 2011
31-Jan-10
Cap
TOR Dion Phaneuf (24) 9th
Fred Sjostrom (26) 11th
Keith Aulie (20)
CGY Matt Stajan (26)
Niklas Hagman (30)
Ian White (26)
Jamal Mayers (35)
4-Feb-10
Salvage
NJ Ilya Kovalchuk (26) 1st
Anssi Salmela (25)
2nd 2010 (Jonathon Merrill)
ATL Niclas Bergfors (22) 23rd
Johnny Odua (28)
Patrice Cormier (19)
1st 2010 (traded)
2nd 2010 (traded)
22-Jun-10
BOS Nathan Horton (25) 5th
Greg Campbell (27)
FLA Dennis Wideman (27)
1st 2010 (traded)
3rd 2011

Typically there are at least three "Big Fish" trades each year.  So far, there has only been one this season.  Although "Cap" trades haven dominated the past year, the majority of trades have been either "Salvage" or "Tank" trades.

By "Salvage" trade, we refer to a situation where either a player does not want to remain with the team or the team has given up on the player.  By "Tank" trade, we refer to when a team literally gives away a top player with the intent of finishing low enough to get a lottery pick.  There can be a "Budget" element to a "Tank" trade.  But, never doubt the trading team having its eye on the prize (lottery pick).

The "Tank" trades are most striking because it involved St. Louis trading Chris Pronger to tank to the 1st pick to draft Erick Johnson at the end of the season.  Boston traded Joe Thornton to tank to 5th last to draft Phil Kessel.  Tampa Bay traded Brad Richards to tank to last overall to draft Steven Stamkos.  Los Angeles traded Mike Cammalleri to tank to 5th last to draft Brayden Schenn.

Whenever a 1st round draft pick player is traded, the trading team usually expects either a 1st round draft pick player or 1st round draft pick in return.  Dion Phaneuf and Jay Bouwmeester trades are two exceptions.

As a result, expect Nazem Kadri, Luke Schenn, Phil Kessel, Dion Phaneuf, and 1st round draft picks to be in play when Toronto has "Big Fish" trade talks with any team.  To avoid giving up these players, Toronto will have to target teams wanting to do a "Depth" trade with a 2nd liner because they have a top prospect waiting to take over.  Mike Komisarek, Colby Armstrong, Fred Sjostrom, and Matt Lashoff are other 1st round draft pick players who can be secondary players in a deal.

"Salvage" trade scenarios are brewing for players such as Shea Weber and Zach Parise.  However, they are more likely to be summer trades if they materialize.  Only one of the past five "Salvage" trades occurred at trade deadline.  The other four occurred in the off-season.

Teams wanting to do a "Tank" trade might be Toronto's wild card.  Such a team will be motivated to trade with Toronto because it can help lift Toronto out of a lottery pick position while they drop into one.  Edmonton, Ottawa, Florida, St. Louis, Buffalo, and Columbus are candidates for such a trade.  Of course, this list can grow as we approach trade deadline.  Ottawa trading Jason Spezza or Columbus trading Rick Nash would be similar to Boston "Tank" trading Joe Thornton.

Ultimately, it is up to the team holding the "Big Fish" to determine if and when the trade occurs.  All Brian Burke can do is be prepared when the opportunity arises.  In other words, have the cap space and trading assets available to capitalize on the opportunity.  It has payed off for him in the past with a Stanley Cup.

In the next two weeks, we will cover "Brian Burke's Next Trade - Part 4 - Tomas Kaberle and the Time Machine Trade" plus "The Winnipeg Curse".

In Case You Missed It

Brian Burke's Next Trade - Part 2 - Making Room for Prospects

Brian Burke's Next Trade - Part 1

After Thoughts

It is interesting how Boston Bruins recovered from the Joe Thornton "Tank" trade with free agent signings Tim Thomas, Zdano Charo, and Marc Savard.

Post Script 14-Feb-2011

Brian Burke's Next Trade - Part 4 - Tomas Kaberle and the "Time Machine" Trade

Post Script 28-Feb-2011

Brian Burke has "Time Machine" traded Tomas Kaberle, Francois Beauchemin, and Kris Versteeg to acquire Boston's 2011 1st and conditional 2nd, Philadelphia's 2011 1st, Joe Colborne (20 years old, drafted 16th overall 2008), Jake Gardiner (20 years old, drafted 17th overall 2008), and Joffrey Lupul (27 years old, drafted 7th overall 2002).

He clearly has loaded up with assets which can be used in "Catching the Big Fish" trades.





Follow @Leafschatter 

Sunday, January 23, 2011

How Brian Burke Gets Steven Stamkos


Steven Stamkos and Rick Nash
are the Only Players in NHL History
to Win the Goal Scoring Title at 19 Years Old
Other than sending an initial contract proposal, Tampa Bay Lightning does not appear to have made any significant progress in negotiating a contract extension with soon to be Restricted Free Agent Steven Stamkos.

Tampa Tribune published the last media report No Progress on Stamkos Negotiations on 10th of January.  Steve Yzerman and Tampa Bay Lightning may have a "Phil Kessel" situation on their hands.

Steve Yzerman wants to sign Steven Stamkos for Jonathon Toews money instead of Sidney Crosby, Alex Ovechkin, or Vincent Lecavalier money.  Leafschatter published an analysis and review of the situation Steven Stamkos - Restricted Free Agent - Snubbed By Yzerman - Again!  It primarily focused on comparing Steven Stamkos to Jonathon Toews, Vincent Lecavalier, Sidney Crosby, and Alex Ovechkin when they were 19 and 20 year olds plus in the season they signed their contract extension.  In addition, the analysis included the best performances from other 19 and 20-year-olds in NHL history.

Today, we further explore how Steven Stamkos compares to the best 20-year-olds ever and expand into "blank ink" comparisons.  By "blank ink", we mean league-leading performances.  You will see it is ridiculous to suggest Steven Stamkos is comparable to Jonathon Toews instead of Sidney Crosby and Alex Ovechkin and might explain why Steve Yzerman had not received a counter-proposal from Stamkos's agent.

You will also see how vulnerable Tampa is to losing Steven Stamkos if they allow him to explore free agency as a restricted free agent and how Toronto's Brian Burke can make a qualifying offer impossible for Tampa to match.  We will also explore the likelihood of Burke making this offer.

Comparing Steven Stamkos to the Best 20-Year-Old in NHL History

Liseted below are the best scoring seasons by 20-year-olds in NHL history with 20-year-old Steven Stamkos's statistics from this season.  It includes Sidney Crosby's season where he missed 29 games due to injury.  You can find the best 19-year-olds in NHL history in Steven Stamkos - Restricted Free Agent - Snubbed By Yzerman - Again!

Best Scoring Seasons by 20 Year Olds
RankPlayer             Season Team GPG  APts
1
 Wayne Gretzky
1981-82
 Edm
80
92
120
212
2
 Mario Lemieux
1985-86
 Pit
79
48
93
141
3
 Denis Savard
1981-82
 Chi
80
32
87
119
4
 Alex Ovechkin
2005-06
 Was
81
52
54
106
5
 Pierre Turgeon
1989-90
 Buf
80
40
66
106
6
 Joe Sakic
1989-90
 Que
80
39
63
102
7
 Dale Hawerchuk  
1983-84
 Wpg
80
37
65
102
8
 Jimmy Carson
1988-89
 Edm
80
49
51
100
9
 Eric Lindros
1993-94
 Pha
65
44
53
97

 Sidney Crosby
2007-08
 Pit
53
24
48
72

 Steven Stamkos
2010-11
 TB
49
37
29
66

Stamkos is trending to score 110 points this season which ranks 4th in this list.  He ranked 6th all-time in the 19-year-old list while Crosby ranked 2nd.  Wayne Gretzky is the leader in both lists without a close 2nd.  Only three players in both lists have black ink (signifying NHL season leader) for goals, assists, or points: Wayne Gretzky, Sidney Crosby, and Steven Stamkos.  Only Rick Nash and Ilya Kovalchuk led the NHL in goal scoring at ages 19 and 20 but lacked the point product for these lists.

Steven Stamkos led the NHL in goals scored at age 19 and is leading this season at age 20 compelling us to compare him to the best goal scorers at age 20 in NHL history.

Most Goals Scored in a Season by 20 Year Olds
Rank
Player            
 Season 
Team 
 GP 
G   
A
Pts
1
 Wayne Gretzky
1981-82
 Edm
 80
92
120
212
2
 Craig Simpson
1987-88
 Edm
 80
56
34
90
3
 Mike Bossy
1977-78
 NYI
 73
53
38
91
4
 Alex Ovechkin
2005-06
 Was
 81
52
54
106
5
 Jimmy Carson
1988-89
 Edm
 80 
49
51
100
6
 Mario Lemieux
1985-86
 Pit
 79
48
93
141
7
 Luc Robitaille
1986-87
 LA
 79
45
39
84
8
 Eric Lindros  
1993-94
 Pha
 65
44
53
97
9
 Richard Martin
1971-72
 Buf
 73
44
30
74
10
 Barry Pederson
1981-82
 Bos
 80
44
48
92

 Steven Stamkos
2010-11
 TB
49
37
29
66


Steven Stamkos is on a pace to score 61 goals ranking him 2nd on the list after Wayne Gretzky.  His league leading 51 goals from last season is 4th best for all 19 year-olds.  Please notice, only Steven Stamkos and Wayne Gretzky are the only 19 and 20-year-old top goal scorers to lead the NHL in goals scored at this young age.

Black Ink and MVP Comparisons

Steven Stamkos's exclusive 19 and 20-year-old "blank ink" company of Wayne Gretzky and Sidney Crosby invites a greater exploration of how young were the top players when they accomplished NHL Goal Scoring Leadership and received Hart Memorial Trophy (MVP) honours.

Below, you see the youngest players to be goal-scoring leaders in NHL history.

Earliest NHL Goal Scoring Leader
RankPlayerAgeSeasonTeamGPGA Pts
1
Steven Stamkos
19
2009-10 TB 82 51
44
95
1
Rick Nash
19
2003-04 Clb 80 41
16
57
3
Wayne Gretzky
20
1981-82 Edm 80 92
120
212
3
Ilya Kovalchuk
20
2003-04 Atl 81 41
46
87
3
Bobby Hull
20
1959-60 Chi 70 39
42
81
3
Charlie Conacher 
20
1930-31 Tor 37 31
12
43
7
Mike Bossy
21
1978-79 NYI 80 69
57
126

Only Rick Nash accompanies Steven Stamkos for the youngest player to be an NHL season goal-scoring leader.  Wayne Gretzky first achieved this status at age 20 with Ilya Kovalchuk, Bobby Hull, and Charlie Conacher.  Alex Ovechkin did not achieve this status until age 22.  The year Washington extended his contract by 13 years for $9.538 mil.

MVP - Hart Memorial Trophy Honours

Steven Stamkos has yet to receive MVP (Hart Memorial Trophy) honours.  However, he will be the 3rd youngest player in NHL history to receive it if he wins it this season.  Only Wayne Gretzky and Sidney Crosby will have won it at a younger age.

Earliest Hart Memorial (MVP) Trophy Winner
Rank
Player
Age
Season
Team
GP
G
A
Pts
1
Wayne Gretzky
18
1979-80
Edm
79
51
86
137
2
Sidney Crosby
19
2006-07
Pit
79
36
84
120
3
Bobby Orr
21
1969-70
Bos
76
33
87
120
3
Eric Lindros
21
1994-95
Pha
46
29
41
70
5
Mario Lemieux
22
1987-88
Pit
77
70
98
168
5
Alex Ovechkin
22
2007-08
Was
82
65
47
112
5
Bryan Trottier
22
1978-79
NYI
76
47
87
134
5
Gordie Howe
22
1950-51
Det
70
43
43
86
5
Nels Stewart
22
1925-26
Mtl*
36
34
8
42


Yzerman's Problem in Contract Negotiations

Why is Steve Yzerman sticking to his guns on the $6.3 to $6.7 mil range for Steven Stamkos when Alex Ovechkin and Sidney Crosby received significant contract extensions during their first "blank ink" and MVP season?  Frankly, Tampa placed Yzerman in an impossible situation when hiring him as a Manager.  First, Tampa should have worked out a contract extension with Stamkos during last season when he had his breakout year.  Yzerman was not yet the team's Manager.

The second reason involves estimating Tampa's budget.  If you assume they already operate at the limits of their financial budget, you will discover it to be approximately $57.1 mil when you add up their NHL and AHL salaries for this season.  Tampa already has $44 mil in contractual commitments for next season with 11 NHL roster and 16 AHL roster spots open.  This amount goes up to $50.2 mil if Tampa qualifies four of their NHL RFAs (Restricted Free Agents) and 12 of their AHL RFAs with the minimum required and budgets $800k for 6 other NHL roster spots and $65k for the 4 other AHL roster spots.

This leaves Yzerman with $6.9 mil in next season's budget for Steven Stamkos.  Yzerman is most likely taking his negotiating stance because his budget does not leave him with much alternative.  Frankly, Yzerman should simply trade Stamkos to Chicago for Jonathon Toews if he truly believes Stamkos is more comparable to Toews over Crosby and Ovechkin.  In all likelihood, Yzerman is posturing when claiming Stamkos is comparable to Toews.

Yzerman seems to be waiting Stamkos out until Stamkos has no alternative to accept his offer.  If by chance Stamkos receives an offer sheet for $9 to $10 mil a year, Yzerman can simply match it and deal with the potential $3 mil budget overage later in the season.  The overage can be up to $4.8 mil if Stamkos receives a "max cap" offer.

Steve Yzerman would have to move a player such as Ryan Malone, who is due to make $5.5 mil salary next season, to fix the budget overage.  His other budget options are Mattius Ohland $5.5 mil, Martin St. Louis $5.5 mil, and Vincent Lecavalier $10 mil.

Yvzerman's Exposure

This fallback plan has one hole it.  It may not withstand the pressure of a front-end loaded contract.  For example, a team can offer Steven Stamkos an 11-year $9.5 mil cap salary contract where it is front-end loaded with a $29.5 mil 1st year salary and $7 mil salary for each of the remaining 10 years.  Tampa Bay may not have the financial means to handle this budget overage.  Matching this qualifying offer might turn this team into the Winnipeg Jets within a year or two.

The Toronto Threat

Will Brian Burke pounce on the opportunity to scoop Steven Stamkos from Tampa Bay Lightning?  It will cost Toronto four 1st round draft picks.

My sense is Brian Burke prefers to find a first line forward in the $5 to $6 mil cap salary range.  However, he is having difficulty acquiring such a player and might have to resort to "Plan B".  "Plan B" has $23 mil in cap space available next season with 12 roster spots to fill.  When you factor in RFA resignings, Brian Burke probably has up to $10 mil in cap space next season to sign Steven Stamkos.  It goes up to $13 mil if the cap increases by $3 mil.

If Brian Burke is truly considering Steven Stamkos as a "Plan B" option, he must weigh it against the possibility of John Tavares being an RFA the following season.  New York Islanders is a woeful team.  It is a classic example of "tanking".  One of the biggest ramifications of tanking is players not wanting to play for the team.  Will the Islanders have this problem with John Tavares?  They certainly have it with Evgeni Nabakov.

The cap hit for signing Tavares in 2012 is most likely within $7 mil and would only cost two 1sts, one 2nd, and one 3rd round draft pick.  In addition, the Islanders are equally vulnerable to a front-end loaded contract.  It appears their budget is about $43 mil and will have at most $8.2 mil available in their budget for Tavares.  A front-end loaded contract with $27 mil in the first year may be too much for New York to match.

During the 2009 Entry Draft, Brian Burke did express his interest in John Tavares and brushed off anyone who thought the idea of getting John Tavares was absurd.  Perhaps, he already had this scheme in mind.  Will the new CBA in 2012 undermine this plan?

Equally interesting is the rumoured Tomas Kaberle deal with Tampa Bay, which fell apart in the final hour on 15th of August.  Reports had a trade worked out with Toronto sending Tomas Kaberle to Tampa Bay for Ryan Malone plus other elements.  Reports had trade discussions to the point where Ryan Malone had waived his no-trade clause for the deal.  But, for some reason, the trade fell apart in the final hour.  Did Brian Burke conclude in the final hour it will be difficult for Tampa to extend Steven Stamkos with Ryan Malone on their payroll?

Conclusion

All of this can end up as simple speculation if Steve Yzerman extends Steven Stamkos before the end of the season.  If the 2011-2012 budget is limiting Tampa's offer, it can be resolved by trading Ryan Malone.  However, Steve Yzerman may end up outsmarting himself if relies on simply matching any qualifying offer accepted by Steven Stamkos.  New York Islanders should pay close attention because they will be up next the following season with John Tavares.





Follow @Leafschatter 

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Brian Burke's Next Trade - Part 2 - Making Room for Prospects

Brian Burke Made Room for Tyler Bozak by
Losing Staffan Kronwall on Re-Entry Waivers
Brian Burke will have to make room for at least 11 new players on his 50 Active Player Roster.  He presently has 48 players on the 50 Active Player Roster.  The 11 new players will come from the 19 prospects/draft choices on his 90 Player Reserve List (which includes the 50 Active Player Roster), Entry Level free-agents, and NHL/Pro free agents.

11 new players is a conservative estimation because Burke added 13 last off-season and 12 the previous off-season.  Brian Burke likes to keep two spots open on the 50 Active Player Roster at the beginning of the season in order to have flexibility when making trades or signing free agents.

As a result, expect Brian Burke to move at least 11 players from the current 50 Active Player Roster between now and the off-season.  Who will they be?

Hockey talent and contract status will have a big bearing on who goes.  But, there are other factors.  A player's age, waiver exempt status, and re-entry waiver exempt status.

In short, Burke will categorize players as NHLer, Prospect, or Depth Player.  As the name suggests, NHLers are the players who he expects to be on the 23-Man NHL Roster.  Prospects are the Pro Players who are waiver exempt.  Depth players are the remaining pros on two-way contracts expected to play in the minors.  Brian Burke collects a special type of depth player, which requires a closer look.

Brian Burke collects what I like to call "elite" depth players.  Borderline NHLers can be another characterization.  He acquires them by offering high AHL salaries in a two-way contract when they are free agents.  For example, Mike Zigomannis and Tim Brent have $250k as the AHL salary and Joey Crabb and Danny Richmond have $200k as the AHL salary in their two-way contracts.  Normally, any AHL salary over $105k requires a player to clear re-entry waivers when recalled by their NHL team.  However, any player with at least 320 professional games and no more than 40 games on an NHL roster the previous season or no more than 80 games on an NHL roster the past 2 seasons is exempt from re-entry waivers.  Mike Zigomannis, Joey Crabb, Tim Brent, and Danny Richmond meet the criteria making them exempt from re-entry waivers.

In addition to getting the top AHLers who are exempt from re-entry waivers, this strategy of paying high AHL salaries makes it difficult for budget NHL teams to claim these players when placed on waivers for assignment to Toronto Marlies.  Their budget has little room for the high AHL salary if the borderline NHLer can't stick with their team.

Next season, Matt Lashoff will meet the "elite" depth player criteria.  Tim Brent needs to be assigned to the AHL for at least 3 NHL games to maintain his re-entry waiver exempt status.  Newly acquired Fabian Brunnstrom will not qualify for an "elite" depth player contract.  In fact, Burke may place him on re-entry waivers before the end of the season with the hope another team claims him at half NHL salary so Toronto has room for a college free agent signing.  Brian Burke did it two years ago with Staffan Kronwell to make roster room to sign college free agents Tyler Bozak and Christian Hanson.

A final consideration is an AHL rule requiring each team to dress at least 11 players who played fewer than 320 professional games in the NHL, AHL, and ECHL.  This is easy for Toronto to manage with the overall youth in its organization.

Below, you see a table listing the 48 players currently on the 50 Active Player Roster plus prospects on Toronto's 90 Player Reserve list who are eligible to play in either the NHL and AHL.  We list each player's age in brackets.  NHL roster players are in bold letters.  Players who will be exempt from waivers are in italics.  "Elite" Depth contract players are identified with an *.  Prospects who become unrestricted free agents if unsigned by this summer are identified with a **.  Junior players already signed to a professional contract are identified with a ***.  AHL players trending to have fewer than 320 professional games played by the end of the season are identified with an x.

Under ContractUFAsRFAsProspects
1
J.Finger (31) J.S. Giguere (33) J. Mitchell (26) M. Frattin (23)**
2
F.Beauchemin(30) T. Kaberle (32)D. Boyce (26)x L. Komarov (23)
3
B. Lebda (29) M.Zigomannis(30)* D. Richmond (26)* B. Winnett (21)**
4
M.Komisarek (29) F. Sjostrom (27) A. Foster (26) D. Brodin (20)
5
C. Armstrong (28) J. Crabb (27)* C. MacArthur (25) J. Flaake (20)
6
C. Orr (28) T. Brent (27)* M. Brown (25) J.Blacker (19)***
7
M. Grabovski (27)
J. Rosehill (25) J.Devane (19)***
8
J.Gustavsson(26)
F. Brunnstrom (25)x K. Ryan (19)
9
D. Phaneuf (25)
R. Hamilton (25)x B. Smith (19)
10
N. Kulemin (24)
T. Bozak (24) S. Olden (18)
11 K. Versteeg (24)
C.Gunnarsson(24) P.Granberg (18)
12 P. Kessel (23)
C. Hanson (24)x
13 J. Rynnas (23)x
B. Scrivens (24)x
14 S. Gysbers (23)x
M. Lashoff (24)
15 M. Mueller (22)x
B. Irwin (23)x
16 K. Holzer (22)x
J. Reimer (22)x
17 J. Mikus (22)x
L. Caputi (22)x
18 R. Slaney (22)x
G. Scott (22)x
19 K. Aulie (21)x
L. Schenn (21)
20 R. Greenop (21)x


21 D. Mitchell (21)x


22 N. Kadri (20)x


23 J. D'Amigo (19)x



The top candidates to go are in red.  You can expect Burke to shop Robert Slaney and Dale Mitchell where he offers to take in return an AHLer in the final year of a one-way NHL contract.  This will be similar to the Mikhail Stefanovich for Fabian Brunnstrom trade.  Effectively, Toronto gives a team budget relief in exchange for roster relief.  Ideally, Toronto will acquire an "elite" depth player candidate when making this type of trade.  A perfect candidate is Edmonton's Alexandre Giroux.  The 29-year-old has a $500k one-year one-way contract.  He is second in AHL scoring and meets the criteria for a "depth" player contract.

UFAs Tomas Kaberle, J. S. Giguere, and Fred Sjostrom are unlikely to return next season.  In total, this provides us with five strong candidates to be moved from the 50 Active Player Roster.  Finding six more candidates from the RFAs and remaining UFAs will be challenging.  Of course, this number goes up if you can't move all of the top five candidates.  I have taken the liberty of identifying the top ten candidates when considering which five to move.  These players might end up as throw-ins for a bigger trade.

Be prepared to see a steady flow of prospects and depth players moved each year from the 50 Active Player Roster to make room for new prospects.  The 50 Active Player Roster is a constraint put in place to prevent large market teams from having a competitive advantage in player development over budget teams.

Brian Burke has found a way to maximize Toronto's financial strength by augmenting draft choices with Entry Level free agents.  This allows him to package prospects to acquire players such as Kris Versteeg.  Expect more of these types of trades at a minor level such as the Matt Lashoff trade.  However, the rules of the game can easily change in 2012 with the next collective bargaining agreement.  This might especially be so when the small market teams see a disadvantage when compared to Toronto.

In two weeks time, we will explore the "Catching the Big Fish" trade in Brian Burke's Next Trade - Part 3.

Post Script - Same Day

You can find frequent updates on Leafs Prospects and Entry Level Free Agents from Hockey Buzz writer Brian Huddle at http://leafnationweekly.blogspot.com  Follow Brian Huddle on Twitter @brianhuddle.

Post Script - 20-Jan-2011

In case you missed it last week Brian Burke's Next Trade - Part 1

Post Script 2-Feb-2011

Follow-on to this post Brian Burke's Next Trade - Part 3 - Catching the Big Fish

Post Script 14-Feb-2011

Brian Burke's Next Trade - Part 4 - Tomas Kaberle and the "Time Machine" Trade





Follow @Leafschatter